3 ms·
That's just semantics. Whether you see it as a reward for some or a punishment for others is besides the point. The argument is about companies getting treated
by kleiba 7y ago
That's just semantics. Whether you see it as a reward for some or a punishment for others is besides the point. The argument is about companies getting treated unequally with no just cause.
- klyrs 7y agoTo spoonerize a colonial slogan, No representation without taxation. Is there just cause to use tax money to help companies who have not paid taxes? Is that fair to the companies who put their money in that pot, to have it doled out to those who didn't? Should companies be treated equally, when they don't behave equally? Because I'm unconvinced that countries owe tax-dodgers a dime. I think that their employees, being taxpayers, should have a safety net in case their employers neither pay taxes nor save for a rainy day. Let this be a lesson to the executives and let their ventures fail.