> The first study in the linked article was conducted in 2010. The first study states "greater than 45%." This is pure misdirection here. > Source? Ideally to

> The first study in the linked article was conducted in 2010. The first study states "greater than 45%." This is pure misdirection here. > Source? Ideally to an independent, real-world study. There are vast resources available [1]. Evidence suggests it is around 60% at the stack, and ~55% at the system level [2]. > EVs are generally able to get up to 77% efficiency in real-world usage, per the link I posted above. The Tesla Model 3, the most-efficient sedan in 2020 according to the US Dept of Energy [1], gets 141 MPGe. That's wells-to-wheels figure. You're comparing very different figures. Also, that 141 MPGe figure is just them gaming the fuel economy test [3]. It is not showing up in real world testing. Using basic physics (which assumes BEVs are 95% at the wheels vs 55% for FCEVs), the peak difference could only be 72%. > Even hybrids get decently close to hydrogen; the Prius, for example, gets 56 MPG. The Prius is a much smaller car than the Clarity. Not really a fair comparison. 1. https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/fuel-cell-vehicle-evaluation.html https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/fuel-cell-vehicle-evaluation.h... 2. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73011.pdf https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73011.pdf 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynX21N4H8H0&feature=emb_title https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynX21N4H8H0&feature=emb_titl...