3 ms·
Sweden started out well but recent numbers indicate some concern. 1,580 deaths [1] as of Apr 20. Here are some comparisons and projections. I'm just using other
by NotSammyHagar 7y ago
Sweden started out well but recent numbers indicate some concern. 1,580 deaths [1] as of Apr 20. Here are some comparisons and projections. I'm just using other people's estimates (I'm no expert but IHME ([3]) is). Sweden's expected total deaths of 5,890 by IHME, looks to be about 4,000 more deaths (preventable?) than comparable countries per capita (comparing Sweden to Switzerland which has 1429 current deaths). All data as of April 20, 2020 evening time PST us, or Apr 21 6am utc.
Current deaths per million population: Sweden 156 deaths/mil, Norway 63 d/m, Finland 33d/m, Switzerland 165 d/mil; overall populations Sweden 10 mil, Finland 5.5 mil, Norway 5.x mil, Switz. 8.5 mil.
Sweden not doing well compared to Norway & Finland but it's doing better than Spain, Italy, France (446 deaths/mil, 399 d/m, 310 d/m). If you look at Sweden's daily numbers it varies a lot in a kind of repeatable way. That's apparently attributable to private labs are closed on the weekends and there's a delay in reporting (similar things in other countries); some countries report 1 day late to add up everything too.
Doubling per day time [2], [4], [5]. This is more complicated but Sweden is growing faster than comparisons. I don't have exact current numbers.
Predictions of total deaths [3]: Sweden 5,890 and Switzerland 1,584 (recall pop is 10 mil vs 8.5 mil). Notice Sweden has many more deaths per capita. Norway 280 expected deaths (5+ mil pop). Sweden will have disproportionately more deaths than Switzerland (pop adjusted Switzerland 1584-> expected 1863 per capita (1585*10/8.5). But expected deaths is 5,890, 4000 more!
1. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden (etc)
2. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-confirmed-deaths-since-5th-death https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-confirmed-deaths-si...
3. https://covid19.healthdata.org/sweden https://covid19.healthdata.org/sweden
4. http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/ http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/
5. https://www.economist.com/news/2020/03/11/the-economists-coverage-of-the-coronavirus https://www.economist.com/news/2020/03/11/the-economists-cov...
I hope this was useful, hopefully not too many typos!
- htfu 7y ago[3] says 1000+ ICU beds needed and capacity 79 (!?) when actual numbers are 1000+ beds, of which about half are in use. So I would heavily discount its conclusion that deaths in Sweden will somehow surpass Germany (!?). In any case be mindful of the confidence intervals, they are huge and the projections seem much more volatile in general than local ones.
- NotSammyHagar 7y agoAgree this is far from an exact science and these estimates are adjusted as information and situations change. Still the much higher deaths expected per capita is shocking. One days passing has new info, higher deaths for Sweden than Sweden (185 vs 7) and also in new positive cases (545 vs 129). It's just one day but the trend is terrible. It's far worse in the us where I live, with multiple states about to open up and kill people unnecessarily.
- htfu 7y agoRight, I'm saying these expectations - and evidently some of the source data - are a bit out of sync with the ones in play on the ground. Any model is only as good as its inputs, after all. Daily numbers made me react as well, they say it's a post-weekend thing. Perplexing to me but then that's what rolling averages and trends are for, I suppose.