>> I'd thought said BS was largely gone from the books. It basically was by the time this case was argued. But there was sufficient interest in how to rule on

>> I'd thought said BS was largely gone from the books. It basically was by the time this case was argued. But there was sufficient interest in how to rule on it (see Thomas' concurrence with the judgement only, and Kagan's dissent). The 6-3 split was pretty fractured as evidence for why they wanted to hear it. It is no surprise Gorsuch wrote the court's opinion; he has a particular disdain for things that impede civil liberties.