They want other people to stake their money on testing this claim. This is why I believe these rants about WebM are agenda-driven. Who says Google wants peopl

They want other people to stake their money on testing this claim. This is why I believe these rants about WebM are agenda-driven. Who says Google wants people to front the responsibility? This is your claim. I don't think Google bought WebM for the purpose of screwing the implementors. That doesn't mean I think we're all safe, it just means we need more information before jumping to conclusions. It also does not mean we should use WebM without discretion. By that argument, any discussion of individual Google products would be "agenda driven". That's absurd. It's absurd to disregard that out of all the possible Google technologies (maps, android, API), WebM is considered most harmful. Especially since most who share this vision are Apple users (again, so am I). I can't ignore the obvious, stitched together, lop-sided point of view.