4 ms·
For what it's worth, the rest of their reporting is still fairly high quality; from what I understand, newsrooms and editorial boards are entirely separate enti
by ryeights 6y ago
For what it's worth, the rest of their reporting is still fairly high quality; from what I understand, newsrooms and editorial boards are entirely separate entities at most news companies.
If you're looking for deeper analysis-type articles, I would recommend The Economist--they only publish once a week, but they provide broader views on political and socioeconomic trends that daily papers lose amongst all the details. (They are owned by several rich families including the Rothschilds, though, and some of their articles have a globalist bias.)
I use the Bypass Paywalls extension[1] to read FT premium articles; the daily "US markets open higher/lower/flat on <insert post-rationalization here>" on the FT's front page does get tiring.
[1]: https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox
- wahern 6y agoI like the Economist, but the Economist isn't timely. If you pick a dozen of the best political-economic reporters, especially the ones following the scholarship, aggregate their articles, and connect the threads, you've got an Economist issue 6 months to 2 years before the Economist does, except the Economist articles will elide all the messiness so that the concepts seem more definitive.
- ryeights 6y agoThat’s fair. I find their COVID-19-related reporting to be fairly current, at least.