2 ms·

Entirely predictable after Murdoch acquired it. It's hard to find a consistently reliable and credible source these days. Last year I switched from an FT subsc

by wahern 7y ago

Entirely predictable after Murdoch acquired it. It's hard to find a consistently reliable and credible source these days. Last year I switched from an FT subscription to Bloomberg after the FT moved all the adult content (non-blog type articles from senior staff that aren't just reiterating a liberal Twitter consensus) to a much more expensive subscription level. But Bloomberg has too much content. I can barely wade through it and don't know where to start. I'm not a trader--I just want an objective, consistent, and timely eye on global political-economic happenings beyond what comes off the AP wire. sigh Maybe I should go back to the FT.

ryeights 7y ago
For what it's worth, the rest of their reporting is still fairly high quality; from what I understand, newsrooms and editorial boards are entirely separate entities at most news companies. If you're looking for deeper analysis-type articles, I would recommend The Economist--they only publish once a week, but they provide broader views on political and socioeconomic trends that daily papers lose amongst all the details. (They are owned by several rich families including the Rothschilds, though, and some of their articles have a globalist bias.) I use the Bypass Paywalls extension[1] to read FT premium articles; the daily "US markets open higher/lower/flat on <insert post-rationalization here>" on the FT's front page does get tiring. [1]: https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox
- wahern 7y ago
  I like the Economist, but the Economist isn't timely. If you pick a dozen of the best political-economic reporters, especially the ones following the scholarship, aggregate their articles, and connect the threads, you've got an Economist issue 6 months to 2 years before the Economist does, except the Economist articles will elide all the messiness so that the concepts seem more definitive.
  - ryeights 7y ago
    That’s fair. I find their COVID-19-related reporting to be fairly current, at least.
rstuart4133 7y ago
A comment from Australia's previous Prime Minister on Murdock's newspapers, who lead a government on the right https://theconversation.com/e-136746 https://theconversation.com/e-136746: > News Corp “I think was well described as ‘a political organisation that employs a lot of journalists’”; The Australian “defends its friends, it attacks its enemies, it attacks its friends’ enemies, and the tabloids do the same.” And we also have this comment from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/16/malcolm-turnbull-news-corp-is-like-a-political-party-with-the-murdochs-encouraging-intolerance https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/16/malco... : > Turnbull says his fatal flaw, according to media barons, was not that he was “too liberal” but his lack of deference and his personal wealth, because all the billionaires liked a politician who depended on them. That last statement has all the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory - no evidence, and so appealing to the intellect.

by wahern 7y ago

ryeights 7y ago

For what it's worth, the rest of their reporting is still fairly high quality; from what I understand, newsrooms and editorial boards are entirely separate entities at most news companies. If you're looking for deeper analysis-type articles, I would recommend The Economist--they only publish once a week, but they provide broader views on political and socioeconomic trends that daily papers lose amongst all the details. (They are owned by several rich families including the Rothschilds, though, and some of their articles have a globalist bias.) I use the Bypass Paywalls extension[1] to read FT premium articles; the daily "US markets open higher/lower/flat on <insert post-rationalization here>" on the FT's front page does get tiring. [1]: https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox

wahern 7y ago
I like the Economist, but the Economist isn't timely. If you pick a dozen of the best political-economic reporters, especially the ones following the scholarship, aggregate their articles, and connect the threads, you've got an Economist issue 6 months to 2 years before the Economist does, except the Economist articles will elide all the messiness so that the concepts seem more definitive.
- ryeights 7y ago
  That’s fair. I find their COVID-19-related reporting to be fairly current, at least.

rstuart4133 7y ago

A comment from Australia's previous Prime Minister on Murdock's newspapers, who lead a government on the right https://theconversation.com/e-136746 https://theconversation.com/e-136746: > News Corp “I think was well described as ‘a political organisation that employs a lot of journalists’”; The Australian “defends its friends, it attacks its enemies, it attacks its friends’ enemies, and the tabloids do the same.” And we also have this comment from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/16/malcolm-turnbull-news-corp-is-like-a-political-party-with-the-murdochs-encouraging-intolerance https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/16/malco... : > Turnbull says his fatal flaw, according to media barons, was not that he was “too liberal” but his lack of deference and his personal wealth, because all the billionaires liked a politician who depended on them. That last statement has all the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory - no evidence, and so appealing to the intellect.