2 ms·
Ok, so your claim is that one org representing two states could not poll and get local comments from actual people in those two states? Edit: can’t reply to cl
by SlowRobotAhead 6y ago
Ok, so your claim is that one org representing two states could not poll and get local comments from actual people in those two states?
Edit: can’t reply to claim below but have yet to see any evidence this isn’t an authentic org that represents two states. Why can leadership of this org not be people from these states?
- untog 6y ago> As a true grassroots movement we are comprised of farmers, doctors, mechanics, teachers, hunters, military personnel, and retirees. These are the people that we report to—not a boss 1,000 miles away who doesn’t understand Minnesota and what Minnesotans want. That quote is a sample of what the entire page is like: Minnesota, by Minnesota, for Minnesota. It’s very clear that they’re trying to signal they are something other than what they really are. The article goes into detail on who actually owns the site.
- Tagbert 6y agoThe problem isn’t that it is one organization but it is going out of it’s way to hide that. That suggests that it’s motives are not quite what it professes. An honest organization can operate in multiple states but is open about that. What are they trying to hide?