3 ms·
Conducting experiments is expensive in both money and effort. Let's all sit in our comfy chairs and build fancier models with garbage data instead. If we could
by pacala 6y ago
Conducting experiments is expensive in both money and effort. Let's all sit in our comfy chairs and build fancier models with garbage data instead. If we could divine just the right formula, it will magically paper over the holes in the data. Sounds like every other scientific area I'm aware of. For whatever reason, the experimentalist is a dying breed.
Edit: Do you happen to have a link to a good aggregator for listening to "what's being published"?
- URSpider94 6y agoYou do know that epidemiologists are statisticians, right? They, um, don’t do experiments and never have and never will. They crunch numbers and fit them to models. Which is what they are doing. If you want to see more data, well yes, so does everyone. What magic tool would you like people to use to get that data? As I explained above, we seem to have a shortage of swab tests to determine infection, and antibody tests only became available about a week ago, at which point people started to use them. Not quite sure what more you are asking to be done here?
- pacala 6y agoThat attitude reminds me of certain type of software engineers: We are engineers, our time is too valuable to write tests, hire someone else to do so. When I hear that, I run away. Fast. The world needs results, and there are little. How about we stop the excuses and roll our sleeves instead?