3 ms·

So I read all of this and to me it sounds like much ado about nothing. Can anyone explain, without loaded language, what is wrong here? "People I don't like (g

• papeda 7y ago
  The content of the article explores (and to a large extent answers) the question in its headline. It doesn't seem to make any value judgements. It is interesting to see who is behind this cause and organizing to support it. The track record of the Dorr brothers suggests their involvement is not motivated by genuine interest in the cause.
  • im3w1l 7y ago
    I read the article but it's coming from a very different viewpoint than mine. And because of the format of the article it wasn't clear whether all the domains traced to Dorr Brothers or if only some of them did. It keeps going after that connection after all. One thing I'm curious about, if Dorr brothers are ripping off Republicans - why are Republicans not upset? Why are Democrats upset on their behalf?
  • casefields 7y ago
    And it was completely wrong: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/04/reopen-liberate-urls/ https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/04/reopen-liberate... The political tunnel vision was strong with this one.
    • im3w1l 7y ago
      I don't think your article invalidates the discussion papeda and I had. He may have had "tunnel vision" and only focused on a small part of the story, but as far as I can tell the Dorr Brother involvement has not been discredited.
• happytoexplain 7y ago
  >Can anyone explain, without loaded language >"People I don't like (gun rights, republicans) are organizing in favor of a cause I don't support (reopening)" This is intensely hypocritical.