3 ms·
Based on several studies using different methods, the death rate (infection fatality rate, or IFR) is likely around 0.5% So if you go back the average time fro
by spion 7y ago
Based on several studies using different methods, the death rate (infection fatality rate, or IFR) is likely around 0.5%
So if you go back the average time from infection to death (2-3 weeks) you can get a sense what the ratio was in your area back then.
[1]: https://mothership.sg/2020/03/iceland-covid-19/ https://mothership.sg/2020/03/iceland-covid-19/ (I did the work on the side, extrapolated to about 0.2%-0.5%)
[2]: https://www.land.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/zwischenergebnis_covid19_case_study_gangelt_0.pdf https://www.land.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/zwis... (Germany study, 0.37%, decent sampling method)
[3]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234121 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234121 (Diamond princess ship, 0.5%)
[4]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v1 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v... (Santa Clara county study, 0.15% - 0.3% if you do the math). Methodological problems with the method of sampling that might increase the number of positives and the test specificity issues might increase false positives, but probably still in the ballpark
- Retric 7y agoDimond Princess had 14 deaths out of ~700 infected or a 2% fatality rate though that number has slowly climbed over time. As they tested everyone initially finding a large number of asymptotic cases that’s likely extremely accurate. The difference is the population was more heathy than the general population, and while older on average, it had a lower percentage of people 95+ years old.