This is another irresponsible headline. I cannot read the article, so correct me if I am wrong, but if what others said is true... It was not random because t

This is another irresponsible headline. I cannot read the article, so correct me if I am wrong, but if what others said is true... It was not random because they didn't randomly select people, they let people self-select! If they gave the total number of people who took the test, and total number of people asked, you could at least get a range. Of course, that range would still be biased to people who are walking around during a time when they should be sheltering in place. At best, 30% of people who were offered a covid antibody test in public had antibodies. I think its safe to say that journalists have a responsibility to get the headlines right on this topic or they risk causing a lot of people to make bad decisions after hearing that 30% of people already have this disease. There is a real human cost of this click-bait, and it will be deaths.