3 ms·
"Facts not in evidence." You're ascribing malice to the judicial system and making it sound like a conspiracy. There's a fact - data was destroyed. An investig
by kovar 16y ago
"Facts not in evidence." You're ascribing malice to the judicial system and making it sound like a conspiracy.
There's a fact - data was destroyed. An investigation may be able to determine what that data was. Either the human who deleted the data or the firmware can tell you why.
No guilt.
- bugsy 16y agoI delete files all the time and so do you. Describing this normal and routine occurrence using the nefarious sounding and certainly biased term "destroying data" is absurd.
- kovar 16y agoGreetings, That is one of the reasons I objected to the article - it uses emotionally loaded language. We're in agreement there. But continuing in that vein doesn't advance anyone's knowledge.