3 ms·
I've found it to be pretty effective to simply not engage with those who keep taking the worst possible interpretations of your (or others) arguments. It sort o
by TheSoftwareGuy 6y ago
I've found it to be pretty effective to simply not engage with those who keep taking the worst possible interpretations of your (or others) arguments. It sort of simulates an environment where everyone is charitable.
In other words, "Don't feed the trolls"
- Benjammer 6y agoTit for tat has always been the solution to prisoner's dilemma. The people who think "prisoner's dilemma" means "I should be wholly and utterly selfish, because it's the logical thing to do" are just idiots who don't understand how cooperation can work over time and repeated trials to build trust.
- resonantjacket5 6y agoThat's alright sometimes. But there's usually a 100 (or something) readers to 1 posters ratio. If none of the "trolls" are contested that leaves the impression that it's a legitimate opinion. I don't think the option of "don't feed the trolls" really works in such scenarios.
- lonelappde 6y agoIn those cases you are talking to the audience, not to the trolls. It doesn't matter what the trolls meant; it matters what you say.