4 ms·

So I looked at one example (the VPN misconceptions one) and coming at it from the perspective of someone looking for an argument (the "Sea Lions" referred to in

So I looked at one example (the VPN misconceptions one) and coming at it from the perspective of someone looking for an argument (the "Sea Lions" referred to in the OP) the whole thing really just feels like a giant straw man. Few if any of the "questions" in the FAQ are stances I'd actually take in a debate about VPNs, and the flaws I see in the arguments the FAQ presents aren't addressed at all by the follow-up questions that are present.

some_furry 7y ago
To address this deficit, the latest release (v0.4.0, released over the weekend) includes a "Question Box" feature that lets people submit follow-up questions, in the same spirit as curiouscat.me. To prevent spam and abuse, it's limited to authenticated users. I noodled over ways to make it work with anonymous users, but that's ultimately a losing battle. (See also: TrollForge.) The admins can decide their access policy (invite-only or open registration, Twitter auth or username+password, etc.). The platform is open source software, and I'm trying to make it as easy and accessible for folks to set it up as I can.