2 ms·
One big limitation right now is that we're basing estimates on confirmed test positive date as opposed to first onset of symptoms which is a much cleaner signa
by shalmanese 7y ago
One big limitation right now is that we're basing estimates on confirmed test positive date as opposed to first onset of symptoms which is a much cleaner signal. Unfortunately, first onset of symptom data doesn't appear to be collected anywhere in a systematic fashion.
See this study from China where the use of onset of symptom data allowed them to estimate R much more accurately: https://twitter.com/XihongLin/status/1236075174069440512 https://twitter.com/XihongLin/status/1236075174069440512
From the official WHO Report, page 7, you can see how recording onset date effectively allows you to "see" a week into the future: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-chi...
- mzs 7y agoIndeed, for example I-NEDSS lacks an onset date for nearly two of five confirmed cases in Kane co: $ head -1 kane-2020-04-19-2020-04-19-17:31:23-CDT.csv Age Range,Age,Case Count,City,Death,Reported Date,Sex,State,Symptom Onset $ awk -F, '!$9 { t++ } END { n = NR - 1; printf("%s %s %.1f%%\n", t, n, t * 100 / n) }' kane-2020-04-19-2020-04-19-17:31:23-CDT.csv 233 607 38.4% https://www.kanehealth.com/ https://www.kanehealth.com/