3 ms·
This is basically where I stand as well. Git has no real appeal for me, but GitHub does. Plus, with the ridiculously easy hg-git[1] tool, I'm able to take advan
by woogley 16y ago
This is basically where I stand as well. Git has no real appeal for me, but GitHub does. Plus, with the ridiculously easy hg-git[1] tool, I'm able to take advantage of GitHub while staying in my Hg comfort zone :)
[1]: http://hg-git.github.com/ http://hg-git.github.com/
- chousuke 16y agoHeh, I'm the exact opposite. I use a hg-to-git tool to access hg repositories, because I'm much more comfortable with git. I often hear people claiming hg is easier to use and has a better interface, but every time I have to use hg it rubs me the wrong way because I can't use it like I use git :/ (In particular, I find hg branches needlessly complicated and cumbersome compared to git's "just a pointer" model) I guess between the two you'll end up using the one you first bother to learn beyond memorising basic commands.
- cageface 16y agoSame. Branches are a dealbreaker.
- megaman821 16y agohg bookmarks are the equivalent of git branches for the most part. Check out those next time you use mercurial.