3 ms·
Ah, but you see, he specifically wants a shirt without stripes as dialectically opposed to a shirt with stripes. A plain shirt just won't do. See: https://www.
by cosmojg 7y ago
Ah, but you see, he specifically wants a shirt without stripes as dialectically opposed to a shirt with stripes. A plain shirt just won't do.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmJVsaxoQSw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmJVsaxoQSw
- labster 7y agoIf there's a dialectic here, does that mean there is a synthesis state between stripes and non-stripes? Is it polka dots?
- bryanrasmussen 7y agoI think Plaid.
- kempbellt 7y agoStrangely, in the context of the "Coffee without cream" example given in the video, I can see it possibly interpreted as "Coffee, with cream on the side, but not in it - I'll pour it myself". It's a stretch of assumption, but depending on culture, it could make sense. "Shirt without stripes" is harder to imagine it meaning "strips on the side. I'll add them myself". Language is ever so complicated and contextual.