4 ms·

Yes, but a very very low percentage of the contracts that expire result in delivery. Delivery is expensive. It's cheaper to get oil through a supplier.

• whatok 7y ago
  The percentage of contracts that result in delivery is only a marginal factor in this case. The fact that physical delivery exists makes it so that positions must be closed out; even if the May contract is down 44% on the day and you thought you would be clever buying the dip on Friday when oil couldn't possibly go lower.
• frankchn 7y ago
  That’s true but not really relevant here. if traders are holding on to any open contracts for May past tomorrow, then I believe they will have to take physical delivery. Thus, traders who still have contracts open but cannot take physical delivery will have to close their positions out today or tomorrow, thus causing the dip we are seeing.
  • pas 7y ago
    Are there market makers for those contracts? (So can they sell them at all?)
    • mlrtime 7y ago
      Of course there are market makers, but they aren't going to buy contracts if they can't deliver.
      • pas 7y ago
        Okay, but isn't the point of designated market makers to always provide liquidity?
• deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]