3 ms·
Great explanation of a bad practice. A company should pay for the value they get, which is independent of the location. These calculations never seem to take in
by JoeCortopassi 6y ago
Great explanation of a bad practice. A company should pay for the value they get, which is independent of the location. These calculations never seem to take into effect all the cost savings of having a remote person (office building/parking/food/working space/etc). Instead, they almost always mark the employee as a second tier of worker
- slackfan 6y agoMy company tends to do something similar for starting salaries, but that's because we're a consultancy, and our rates per-market are different. However: In the long term if employees stay with the company long term, salaries tend to get bumped up to approximately the same. So you might get started lower, but your yearly pay bump will be higher.