2 ms·
It's only efficient as a way to funnel taxpayer money into stockholders' pockets. "Privatizing" a service but continuing to pick winners and subsidize them isn'
by notacoward 7y ago
It's only efficient as a way to funnel taxpayer money into stockholders' pockets. "Privatizing" a service but continuing to pick winners and subsidize them isn't really privatizing and isn't compatible with a real free market. It's literally a kind of command economy, albeit one designed to benefit only a few.
- bhupy 7y ago> continuing to pick winners and subsidize them Another approach could be to just give rural Americans more cash, and let them pick the winners, as consumers.