3 ms·
Absolutely agree. I was appalled when I saw the article about not being able to fire teachers and instead putting them into "rubber rooms": http://www.theblaze
by mirkules 16y ago
Absolutely agree. I was appalled when I saw the article about not being able to fire teachers and instead putting them into "rubber rooms":
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/disgraced-teacher-enjoys-well-paid-13th-year-in-rubber-room-after-sexually-molesting-6th-grade-student/ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/disgraced-teacher-enjoys-wel...
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/education/2008/05/04/2008-05-04_teachers_in_trouble_spending_years_in_ru.html http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/education/2008/05/04/200...
And then you have really good teachers who wanted to teach for free but wasn't allowed to (they finally, wisely relented) because of some dumb technicality:
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov/29/local/la-me-lopez29-2009nov29 http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov/29/local/la-me-lopez29-...
(p.s. yes, he was my middle school teacher, and he is an AWESOME teacher)
The future of the education system is grim, and only by drastic measures can a difference be made.
A question: I don't quite understand why the teachers seem to think that a layoff is better than a firing? Does it affect their tenure/experience, or something like that?
- ahoyhere 16y agoYour examples don't make sense because they are not set in Providence. There's no indication that "rubber rooms" are a problem in Providence, either. The rest (and OP) is just supposition as to motives which remain unknown.
- mirkules 16y agoI didn't say that rubber rooms are a problem in Providence. I'm saying that examples like those in New York, Los Angeles and elsewhere are indicative of the state of public education as a whole. I'm saying that I support almost any means necessary for public education reform, the Providence case being one of them.