Also... one of fundamental flaws of Wolfram Physics Project's meta-model is that it uses weightless graphs. There is literally nothing in his model that can pr

Also... one of fundamental flaws of Wolfram Physics Project's meta-model is that it uses weightless graphs. There is literally nothing in his model that can prevent his beautiful graphs from simply collapsing in on themselves, with all the points just piling up on top of each other into a naked singularity before they've even succeeded at forming any space at all! For starters, empty space should have weighted (space-like) connections of the weight value of 1. This accomplishes two things: a) prevents the space from outright collapsing in on itself, and b) forces the space to form a stable configuration For b) part, imagine a 2-dimensional discrete space (graph) made of hexagonal shapes. You will immediately notice that weighing knot (node) connections (with the value of 1) forces that space to maintain a stable spherical configuration (providing that it had formed uniformly to start with. Expand this concept to 3 dimensions, and you'll get a similarly stable 3D configuration (that has been uniformly expanding from the very first step of 1), with 2D surface (at any distance r/step k from the center) being a very good candidate for defining a holographic principle (of some form or another) on. Now... ... wait for Wofram to expand his model with weighted graphs... and then sue his sorry ass for stealing somebody else's idea. P.S. One of the fundamental flaws of WPP's meta-meta-model is... Wolfram himself. A terrible, terrible choice for managing the, literally, biggest breakthrough in physics since QM.