4 ms·
The most basic of the basic first step would be finding an infinite series for calculating Pi, that has only positive elements... like Ramanujan's series, but n
by nil-nada-zilch 6y ago
The most basic of the basic first step would be finding an infinite series for calculating Pi, that has only positive elements... like Ramanujan's series, but not quite, because elements of this series have to produce numbers Nk, for each step k (k=0->infinity), that satisfy the following condition: Nk/k->2Pi for k->infinity.
Until this is achieved (finally giving the complete description of this discrete space/graph of this space), nothing further can be done in physics.
Furthermore... it is not even needed to prove that this space is discrete, because uncertainty principle already proves that it is, by taking notice of the fact that in continuous spaces, quanta of action/momentum/energy can be made arbitrarily small (and, in fact, is equal to 0), which means that h can be made arbitrarily small (and, in fact, is equal to 0).
In other words, uncertainty principle only makes makes sense in discrete spaces... and, as experiments (from 100+ years ago) have already proven, h > 0 in the space this universe is made of (meaning that this space is discrete).
Q.E.D.
Edit: typo and... typo with missing constant 2 from circumference formula.
Addition: Pi is Pi only because of the spatial (graph) configuration. In another uniform space, with a different configuration, circumference formula would have the form of: Nk=aCk, where a is some value (like 2), and C is the (Pi-like) constant derived from spatial (graph) configuration >alone<.
Edit: Added missing k to the general circumference formula. I should really proof-read better, but I'm in a kind of hurry, so you'll forgive me an occasional mistake or two.