>I'm hesitant to quote any search engine share market #s currently because I frankly just don't believe them, or at least they don't seem to line up with anecdo

>I'm hesitant to quote any search engine share market #s currently because I frankly just don't believe them, or at least they don't seem to line up with anecdotal evidence at all. Google seems currently way more dominant than they sometimes get credit for. Huh what is that supposed to mean? That made the article completely useless. Atleast offer something of substance, even it's an anecdote. Does it mean that Google is 100% according to anecdotal evidence? But the very next line says: >Yet at the same time alternatives are arising. And more importantly wrt to the analogy, there are alternatives that in my opinion offer a different enough overall search experience to be preferable to some people, much like Web browsers. Like which ones? Bing? Duckduckgo? Blekko? Coolio? Anything else?