I’m going to make the classic engineer mistake and assume that it’s almost as easy to implement this myself. My understanding is that errorship does something l

I’m going to make the classic engineer mistake and assume that it’s almost as easy to implement this myself. My understanding is that errorship does something like: - register a global exception handler, probably tweaked to hook into framework specific exception mechanisms. - make the exceptions “pretty” - send the exceptions to the datadog event log. The benefits of rolling my own is avoiding a soft dependency on errorship and that I can tweak exception aggregation and reporting. Is the primary defense that errorship only costs $10 per month or is there additional complexity I’ve missed?