3 ms·
I think NYC is already at the "hospital collapse" level tho. The quoted figure would be for a situation with hospitals in perfect operational state. So the Sw
by riffraff 7y ago
I think NYC is already at the "hospital collapse" level tho.
The quoted figure would be for a situation with hospitals in perfect operational state.
So the Sweden reasoning is: we will stay within normal capacity even at peak, and everything will be ok.
If infection rate is actually slow, that may work, but it's not obvious this is true.
- MrMember 7y agoHave the hospitals in New York collapsed? Has anyone been denied treatment because the hospital couldn't handle it?
- riffraff 7y agothat's a good question, and I don't know the answer, I would presume nobody as been denied treatment as that never happened in Lombardy either, you can usually send people to other hospitals, and this has happened in NY too. But you don't need to reach the level of people being denied treatment to be at an "overwhelming" level, where the hospitals are not operating at peak efficiency. There have been many reports of hospitals not having masks, gowns and so on, or lacking ventilators or few people able to use them which need to be overworked. Many hospital workers have been infected, and hospitals had to switch to longer shifts. It's just not business as usual.