4 ms·
If you read the paper it turns out there is no actual evidence for the Air Conditioning route other than "the airflow direction" As a matter of fact "air condi
by glofish 7y ago
If you read the paper it turns out there is no actual evidence for the Air Conditioning route other than "the airflow direction"
As a matter of fact "air conditioning" is not even involved, the same airflow could be just as well caused by a fan or the waiters moving about carrying the air around them.
It is ridiculously sloppy.
- LorenPechtel 7y agoYeah. The 6' safety distance applies to non-moving situations. If you have either moving people (you need more than 6' when following someone moving at a decent pace) or airflow (wind or air conditioners) it changes. This should be obvious, the only reason for research would be to figure out how much it increases the needed distance.
- bookofjoe 7y agohttp://www.urbanphysics.net/COVID19_Aero_Paper.pdf http://www.urbanphysics.net/COVID19_Aero_Paper.pdf