3 ms·
Everybody has biases. Murray wears his on his sleeve. More interesting: do you have concrete and verifiable information that his reporting of the Philip Cross
by 9q9 6y ago
Everybody has biases. Murray wears his on his sleeve.
More interesting: do you have concrete and verifiable information that his reporting of the Philip Cross Affair, that Murray' conjectures about its background, are wrong? Can you put forward an alternative explanation?
- throwaway_pdp09 6y ago"he wears his on his sleeve" - his biases you mean. You've downright stated he's openly biased. So we agree. But that does not mean he's automatically wrong, nor that he's worthy of dismissal overall. Just that I'd take more care to filter what he says than I would with, say, the beeb . Not that the beeb are beyond criticism BTW. And I'm not disagreeing with him that this PC guy is odd and worthy of investigation. It's just that overall fact that he indeed is openly very opinionated. That's fine, so am I, just caveat emptor.