5 ms·
> Of course the media won't cover this story widely, as it won't sell properly, there isn't enough sensationalism. It lowers panic (it would mean the Covid mort
by snowwrestler 7y ago
> Of course the media won't cover this story widely, as it won't sell properly, there isn't enough sensationalism. It lowers panic (it would mean the Covid mortality rate is radically lower than previously feared, even versus common low estimates), rather than raising panic.
I think there is a common misunderstanding here, which is that the mortality rate of COVID-19 is an important factor in policymaking.
It’s not. The actual number of illnesses and deaths is what is important. That’s what maps onto healthcare capacity, which is the limiting factor.
And it is what people really care about. I might find it interesting that there are a large number of asymptomatic carriers, but what I really want to know is whether my friends and family are safe.
- guscost 7y agoYou’re right about mortality rate, but the percent of the population that has been exposed is critical for policy, because it tells us how big any upcoming surge could be. And it’s looking more and more like we got that one badly wrong, so we’re going to end up with thousands of outdated ventilators, a boatload of new national debt, and an even more jaded culture that totally ignores policy folks. Could be worse.