3 ms·
I’m not saying that it is necessarily a bad thing, just that blaming a few months of decreased donations for laying off 37% of your employees doesn’t pass my sn
by cbsks 7y ago
I’m not saying that it is necessarily a bad thing, just that blaming a few months of decreased donations for laying off 37% of your employees doesn’t pass my sniff test.
Why not state the real reason?
- brewdad 7y agoIf your donations were only covering ongoing expenses with nothing left for a reserve fund, then losing a third of your funding and laying off a third of your workforce doesn't seem unreasonable.
- CathedralBorrow 7y agoWait, because you didn't fully understand their reasons, you are now assuming that there is a "real reason" that was deliberately not stated?