6 ms·
Shitpost: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959 Running a CA is not easy, and getting your ro
by Ayesh 7y ago
Shitpost: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959
Running a CA is not easy, and getting your root certificates included in trusted roots is even harder.
For the technical aspects of it, you will need an HSM for the root certificates generated, OCSP servers, a CRL mechanism, and the signing server. Many enterprises already run their own private CA, and there are plenty of free and open source software.
The difficult part is convincing root CA programs. Mozilla, Google, and Apple would be the start, but I suppose Curl/Java/Debian (which sync with Mozilla) will take some time to catch-up too. You need to be audited (by firms like KPMG and they don't come cheap), and they expect a certain level of transparency.
Why would you want to become a CA in the first place? Amazon and cpanel are root CAs that issue certificate for free. LetsEncrypt is free and issues certificates to everyone. I don't think there's any financial profit to be made anymore.
- nurettin 7y ago> LetsEncrypt is free and issues certificates to everyone When using free providers, you will notice that the issued to -> organization field will be empty. Free providers do not compete with company validating trust authorities. They are just developer tools.
- toast0 7y agoYou might notice that, but very few other people do.
- deadbunny 7y agoWhat nonsense. Extended validation schemes are snake oil peddled by CAs to make more money.
- nurettin 7y agoIt is all nonsense until money is involved and customers want to know that the advertised website actually belongs to your legal entity.
- dividuum 7y agoDoes not help in any real way. See https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/12/nope-this-isnt-the-https-validated-stripe-website-you-think-it-is/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/12/nope-... for an example.
- mehrdadn 7y agoThere's a huge difference between "it isn't impossible to bypass" and "does not help in any real way".
- dividuum 7y agoThe only reason to get EV certs is the supposedly "safe" green organization field. As demonstrated it can be circumvented by anyone with minimal monetary motivation. Why even bother in that case? I rate that as "does not help in any real way".
- mehrdadn 7y ago> As demonstrated it can be circumvented by anyone with minimal monetary motivation. Why even bother in that case? Same goes for the lock on your door. Why do you bother? Just take it off.
- dividuum 7y agoI never said that. The alternative isn't no lock of course. It's the free lock that's equally safe to the one with the green "this is safe" sticker that you pay a premium for.
- mehrdadn 7y agoYou do realize the "lock" in this analogy that you claimed "does not help in any real way" is the EV, not the encryption?
- bassman9000 7y agoNo one, other than us, cares about that.
- Ayesh 7y ago> They are just developer tools A CA is a CA. A developer tool would be you signing certificates with your own private CA. LetsEncrypt is often better as they support must-staple, CT timestamps in certificates themselves, and ECDSA leaf certificates support. The snakeoil pitch would have worked 3-4 years back when browsers shows a big yellow label in address bar, but as of now, they all look the same regardless if its a DV, OV, or EV certificate unless you click your way through the certificate information.
- a1369209993 7y ago> Shitpost: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959 > The purpose of this certificate is to allow Honest Achmed to sell bucketloads of other certificates and make a lot of money. Well, they're more honest than any current certificate authority.