3 ms·
Most comments are quite negative, but I think an important reason is that the "flat" style looks pretty good on a screen and feels "native" to the digital media
by goto11 7y ago
Most comments are quite negative, but I think an important reason is that the "flat" style looks pretty good on a screen and feels "native" to the digital media in a way watercolors or pencil or oil paint just doesn't. It is basically the natural evolution from simple icons. Sure most of it is generic and derivative, but this is true for any style.
It is typical that a new media try to emulate older, more prestigious media. Digital lack the physicality, so there was a long infatuation with trying to make it look more "physical" - shadows, texture and so on. Now it seems the tide have turned and print magazines try to look more digital.
- pcurve 7y agoother mediums can look good on screen too. the biggest reasons is skills and cost. Very few people can actually do digital watercolor, pencil, oil, collage, etc. well. Those take years and years of training. Flat illustrations are no picnic, but they're much more forgiving to novice.