3 ms·

The part titled "the science bit" on their homepage is completely unscientific. Am I looking bat the wrong place? Can someone explain the math used here?

• avaku 7y ago
  I haven’t published the details of the algorithm. The science bit is supposed to give some idea, but not details. I know people want the details straight away, but I don’t work in academia, so my goal is not to make a publication, but to gauge interest in applications of this.
  • panpanna 7y ago
    I was more hopping for something like "we use DFT instead of FFT because reasons" No need to publish a scientific report.
    • avaku 7y ago
      Ok, I try. We use Wavelet Transform instead of FFT because it provides suitable resolution across all frequencies. P.S. I've realised that I implemented Wavelet Transform after I've already done it :)
      • memming 7y ago
        You've been retroactively scooped!