4 ms·
Not an Erlang user, but I must say the syntax is beautiful. I know, semantics before syntax, but if you can have both, why not? Looks promising, love the ML-s
by virtualwhys 6y ago
Not an Erlang user, but I must say the syntax is beautiful.
I know, semantics before syntax, but if you can have both, why not?
Looks promising, love the ML-style pattern matching in particular, so clean and terse (wish Scala 3 would ditch the `case` keyword in match statements, but alas not happening)
- lpil 6y agoThank you! I'm glad you like the syntax!