3 ms·
> (which is why Hawaii was ruled out even though it would be technically better) Hawaii wasn't even a state when NASA was created. So there was never any serio
by dntbnmpls 7y ago
> (which is why Hawaii was ruled out even though it would be technically better)
Hawaii wasn't even a state when NASA was created. So there was never any serious consideration for using hawaii as NASA headquarters or launching site. The same goes for puerto rico which is much closer to the equator ( and the lower 48 ) than hawaii. It's not a state, so you can't put something as important as NASA or a launch site on puerto rico.
It's strange, but NASA is older than the state of hawaii.
- jedberg 7y ago> Hawaii wasn't even a state when NASA was created. Technically yes, NASA predates Hawaii by 13 months, but it was well on it's way to statehood by then. The statehood act passed congress in the early 1950s, before the discussions about NASA began.
- dragonwriter 7y ago> Technically yes, NASA predates Hawaii by 13 months, but it was well on it's way to statehood by then. The statehood act passed congress in the early 1950s, before the discussions about NASA began. Cape Canaveral was chosen as a launch site before the discussions about NASA began, too; the first planned launch was planned before those discussions (it was postponed) under the auspices of the early space program coordinated by NACA Special Committee on Space Technology prior to the proposal to build NASA to incorporate and replace NACA.
- ckastner 7y agoRemarkably, a spot in the close vicinity of Cape Canaveral was chosen by Jules Verne as the launch site for the moon travelers in his 1867 book From the Earth to the Moon.
- dntbnmpls 7y ago> The statehood act passed congress in the early 1950s, before the discussions about NASA began. The statehood act was passed in March 1959. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Admission_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Admission_Act And I wouldn't say it was well on its way to statehood. There were lots of racial, political, historical, etc issues at play. Were it not for the desire to grant alaska statehood, it's likely that hawaii would still not be a state given their demographic.
- jedberg 7y agoThat was the last statehood act. The first one passed the House in the early 1950s but never made it through the Senate (because of the aforementioned racial issues).
- dntbnmpls 7y ago> The first one passed the House in the early 1950s but never made it through the Senate (because of the aforementioned racial issues). So it didn't pass congress ( house and senate )? "The statehood act passed congress in the early 1950s" Also, it's my understanding that bills get considered by congress and once passed by congress, then it becomes an act ( law ). So as far as hawaii goes, there has been one and only one statehood act. But I may be wrong here.