3 ms·
It's not "someone else's stuff," it's the city's. The non-profit "manages" the park, but they don't own it. An anology might be that you let a friend watch ove
by jedimastert 7y ago
It's not "someone else's stuff," it's the city's. The non-profit "manages" the park, but they don't own it.
An anology might be that you let a friend watch over a cabin in the woods in exchange for letting you use it for parties and stuff. Now you don't people to use the cabin for a while (perhaps wildfire season or bears spotted very close by), people still keep using the cabin, so you change the locks.
Still arguably a dick move depending on the dynamic of the park and skaters and what have you, but well within the city's rights. The only "damage" was to their own property.
- bluntfang 7y ago>but well within the city's rights. Usually said after the entity in question performs some extreme antisocial behavior [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour
- tehwebguy 7y agoMy bad, I misunderstood that it was owned by a non-profit, it seems it is only managed by them.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]