3 ms·
Also worth noting the video says that a non-profit manages the skate park, but the city dumped sand on it without informing them of the plan.
by bredren 7y ago
Also worth noting the video says that a non-profit manages the skate park, but the city dumped sand on it without informing them of the plan.
- tehwebguy 7y agoAbsolutely psychotic, who would think it's okay to do this to someone else's stuff?
- olyjohn 7y agoThe government.
- jedimastert 7y agoIt's not "someone else's stuff," it's the city's. The non-profit "manages" the park, but they don't own it. An anology might be that you let a friend watch over a cabin in the woods in exchange for letting you use it for parties and stuff. Now you don't people to use the cabin for a while (perhaps wildfire season or bears spotted very close by), people still keep using the cabin, so you change the locks. Still arguably a dick move depending on the dynamic of the park and skaters and what have you, but well within the city's rights. The only "damage" was to their own property.
- bluntfang 7y ago>but well within the city's rights. Usually said after the entity in question performs some extreme antisocial behavior [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour
- tehwebguy 7y agoMy bad, I misunderstood that it was owned by a non-profit, it seems it is only managed by them.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Shivetya 7y agogoing to be interesting to see if they ever reopen it or write it off because of the costs involved. to be frank, this really borders on someone being an asshole, there are less destructive ways to eliminate use.