4 ms·

> Is Handshake based on a cryptocurrency coin? Does that coin trade on coin markets? Are there early backers and investors? Handshake is based on the ideal tha

> Is Handshake based on a cryptocurrency coin? Does that coin trade on coin markets? Are there early backers and investors? Handshake is based on the ideal that the internet belongs to the people. > If so: it's a dead project. I don't know why anyone would take it seriously. I'm skeptical of the entire model for any application. But for Internet infrastructure? Never going to happen. People will always strive for better. I believe it will be Handshake, but if not, something else will come. People find a way, that's how we all got here today. This very thread itself is proof that the current system doesn't fulfill the wishes of humanity and there is a need for change. If you believe Handshake has faults, let's all work together and improve it!

tptacek 7y ago
Sure. Step 1: lose the speculative cryptocurrency.
- rasengan 7y ago
  > Sure. Step 1: lose the speculative cryptocurrency. The step seemed like it lacked any understanding of the mechanism design of handshake, and I realized it's because we skipped a step here. I like to start my count with 0: Step 0: Please read the design notes document. Let's be constructive here. Later: In all seriousness, though, I urge you to read and understand how Handshake works and how different it is from these other 'cryptocurrency' projects that I am (and I'm sure many in the hn community) on the exact same page as you about. I trust you'll see why the community is moving in this direction. Later 2: Just incase you don't read the paper, the coin, and auction process, helps prevent sybil attacks among other things.
  - akerl_ 7y ago
    I could launch a DNS replacement project where users registered a domain name by coming to my house and handing me $1,000 in cash. It would be accurate for me to say that the “come visit me with cash” approach prevented botnet-based brute forcing, among other things. It would also be accurate for an observer to point out that my project has a crucial flaw for replacing DNS. It’s clear you believe the usage of blockchain technology in Handshake is justified. But throughout this thread, whenever the question of ~“is your project backed by a cryptocurrency which is traded speculatively” has been posed, you’ve dodged answering it outright.
    - rasengan 7y ago
      If you read closely, I did not dodge but instead suggested reading the design notes. It’s not worth arguing a point with someone who lacks the understanding of something. Once I realized that this was simply bias and the thread was attacks rather than sincerity, I answered directly. Later: My first response [1] included a direct answer pasted from the design notes - and it’s very clesr. Unfortunately, it won’t help if you don’t know what a Sybil Attack is. I incorrectly assumed that was basic knowledge in 2020 for anyone on Hacker News [2]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22900846 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22900846 [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack
      - tptacek 7y ago
        You just did it again.
        rasengan 7y ago
        If you're saying A) I ignored the cryptocurrency, unfortunately you are wrong. If you're saying B) I didn't explain to you what a sybil attack is, you're right, albeit I did provide a link. In a global unique namespace that has no centralized control, there needs to be constraints and scarcity built into the system itself in order to prevent someone from launching a "sybil attack" which, in this context, means someone could register a trillion names without anything stopping them. By introducing a coin that in itself is a limited resource and including an auction process, essentially, there are a limited number of names since there are a limited number of coins, and, in addition, the auction process itself helps to prevent someone from getting a lot of coins and registering many names. This explanation really just touches the surface as all the intricacies of the architecture are better detailed in full, in our project design notes [1] as I have continued to urge you to read. [1] https://handshake.org/files/handshake.txt https://handshake.org/files/handshake.txt
      - akerl_ 7y ago
        When somebody says ~“is this true” and you say ~“read the docs”, you’re dodging the question. It’s a pretty fair assumption that `tptacek and I are familiar with the docs and the concept of a Sybil attack. Even if we weren’t, you could just as easily say “Yes, the design of Handsake is based around a cryptocurrency, and our implementation involves speculation. For more info, you may want to check out the docs <here>.” Instead, you’re deflecting by insinuating that we haven’t read the spec, and thus refusing to answer the question we’re posing to you.

tptacek 7y ago

Sure. Step 1: lose the speculative cryptocurrency.

rasengan 7y ago
> Sure. Step 1: lose the speculative cryptocurrency. The step seemed like it lacked any understanding of the mechanism design of handshake, and I realized it's because we skipped a step here. I like to start my count with 0: Step 0: Please read the design notes document. Let's be constructive here. Later: In all seriousness, though, I urge you to read and understand how Handshake works and how different it is from these other 'cryptocurrency' projects that I am (and I'm sure many in the hn community) on the exact same page as you about. I trust you'll see why the community is moving in this direction. Later 2: Just incase you don't read the paper, the coin, and auction process, helps prevent sybil attacks among other things.
- akerl_ 7y ago
  I could launch a DNS replacement project where users registered a domain name by coming to my house and handing me $1,000 in cash. It would be accurate for me to say that the “come visit me with cash” approach prevented botnet-based brute forcing, among other things. It would also be accurate for an observer to point out that my project has a crucial flaw for replacing DNS. It’s clear you believe the usage of blockchain technology in Handshake is justified. But throughout this thread, whenever the question of ~“is your project backed by a cryptocurrency which is traded speculatively” has been posed, you’ve dodged answering it outright.
  - rasengan 7y ago
    If you read closely, I did not dodge but instead suggested reading the design notes. It’s not worth arguing a point with someone who lacks the understanding of something. Once I realized that this was simply bias and the thread was attacks rather than sincerity, I answered directly. Later: My first response [1] included a direct answer pasted from the design notes - and it’s very clesr. Unfortunately, it won’t help if you don’t know what a Sybil Attack is. I incorrectly assumed that was basic knowledge in 2020 for anyone on Hacker News [2]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22900846 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22900846 [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack
    - tptacek 7y ago
      You just did it again.
      - rasengan 7y ago
        If you're saying A) I ignored the cryptocurrency, unfortunately you are wrong. If you're saying B) I didn't explain to you what a sybil attack is, you're right, albeit I did provide a link. In a global unique namespace that has no centralized control, there needs to be constraints and scarcity built into the system itself in order to prevent someone from launching a "sybil attack" which, in this context, means someone could register a trillion names without anything stopping them. By introducing a coin that in itself is a limited resource and including an auction process, essentially, there are a limited number of names since there are a limited number of coins, and, in addition, the auction process itself helps to prevent someone from getting a lot of coins and registering many names. This explanation really just touches the surface as all the intricacies of the architecture are better detailed in full, in our project design notes [1] as I have continued to urge you to read. [1] https://handshake.org/files/handshake.txt https://handshake.org/files/handshake.txt
    - akerl_ 7y ago
      When somebody says ~“is this true” and you say ~“read the docs”, you’re dodging the question. It’s a pretty fair assumption that `tptacek and I are familiar with the docs and the concept of a Sybil attack. Even if we weren’t, you could just as easily say “Yes, the design of Handsake is based around a cryptocurrency, and our implementation involves speculation. For more info, you may want to check out the docs <here>.” Instead, you’re deflecting by insinuating that we haven’t read the spec, and thus refusing to answer the question we’re posing to you.