9 ms·
it says stereo so you need two pictures? I was thinking about the photogramemtry technique, this is great... I mean I wonder how accurate it is(with regard to d
by ge96 7y ago
it says stereo so you need two pictures? I was thinking about the photogramemtry technique, this is great... I mean I wonder how accurate it is(with regard to depth calculation from images on a larger scale like feet) but man impressive
- lisper 7y ago> you need two pictures No, that's the brilliant part. They use one image and apply the assumption that it's a picture of a bilaterally-symmetric physical object in order to produce a synthetic second image.
- ge96 7y agohmm probably have to watch the video more thoroughly it seems like you're estimating/guessing the actual dimensions without a new source/angle to compare for the depth aspect. showing my ignorance here -- trained, I guess it depends on margin of error/does it matter, it seems pretty accurate anyway this would be great with regard to reducing camera count if you're not relying heavily on LIDAR or "physical time to flight" sources of measurement