3 ms·
Agreed. It gets to an important point of the purpose of the photo. Photo as a record versus photo as an aesthetic piece. This hurts the photo as a record but im
by 6gvONxR4sf7o 7y ago
Agreed. It gets to an important point of the purpose of the photo. Photo as a record versus photo as an aesthetic piece. This hurts the photo as a record but improves the photo as an aesthetic piece. This would be a bad addition to a security camera, but perhaps a good addition to an instagram pipeline. There are plenty of other issues there, like is it good/healthy for stuff like instagram to be diverging away from records, creating unrealistic (or perhaps literally unreal) expectations. We're taking what are slowly inching closer to imaginative art pieces and presenting them as records.
- gowld 7y agoPhotographs have never been faithful records. The map never the territory. There are always judgement calls. The whole concept of JPEG is to throw away information.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 7y agoNothing's a perfect record, but a thing's purpose can be to serve as a record. Like if you stick seismometer readings into an academic paper, everyone will know there's noise, but that's okay. You did your best. But there are some changes we can agree are bad there. Now, if you stuck your seismometer into an autotuner and sync'd it with led zeppelin, that's okay. Just not if you're putting that into your paper. For a long time, photographs were typically used as records. Even when they were art, they were typically records of something. Soon, we'll be typically doing so much more with them and will have to accept that photos can, but frequently won't serve as records.