5 ms·
> Something that is scalable, is easy to use from a technical perspective and also easy to use by humans? That's exactly what we have right now. This is a bus
by organsnyder 7y ago
> Something that is scalable, is easy to use from a technical perspective and also easy to use by humans?
That's exactly what we have right now.
This is a business/culture/government/economics problem—not a technical one. As long as the end goal of the system is "type in a string of text on any computer connected to the internet, and get the same result[1]", we're going to have issues like this.
When I got my first domain name, the cost was $100 for two years (and $50/year thereafter). At that price, no one thought of squatting on any but the most lucrative domain names—certainly not mass-registering thousands of domains and holding on to them for years. I don't want to go back to those prices, but those are the sorts of parameters that impact the domain name market.
[1] Yes, there non-public zones, geo-routing, etc. But as long as we define "result" as "exactly what the organization controlling that substring wants you to get" I think it works.
- finnthehuman 7y ago>I don't want to go back to those prices, but those are the sorts of parameters that impact the domain name market. The amount of money businesses are willing to spend on branding is large enough that there is no price point that would allow me to both afford renewals on my email server's domain, but doesn't also enable squatting.
- labawi 7y agoThe mere existence of squatting is not as much an issue, as the scale when most domains are speculators and it's hard to get a reasonable name. Also, some TLDs have prior rights and domain dispute processes for speculators. Namespaces can be handled much better than current .com situation.