6 ms·
No. The government should have multiple cloud providers.
by smitty1e 7y ago
No. The government should have multiple cloud providers.
- Ericson2314 7y agoNo. They should run almost everything in-house so it can be properly integrated.
- chadcmulligan 7y agoIsn't the usual business of government to rotate every 5-10 years? - In house is the way to go! - No the pervious administration was wrong - outsourcing is the way to go Lather, rinse, repeat
- Ericson2314 7y agoWith anything relating to advance technology I think the systematic outsourcing has been prevalent since at least WWII.
- solidasparagus 7y agoLike they do now? That hasn't worked out so hot for integration...
- Ericson2314 7y agoNot like they do now. If it was, you and I would know more about it because the infra would be required to be open source public domain
- solidasparagus 7y agoWhat? Why do you think info about Top Secret-ready infrastructure would be public domain?
- Ericson2314 7y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_the_federal_government_of_the_United_States#Exemptions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_t... You would think there is a loophole for classified documents, but it is not mentioned there. They may be a perverse incentive to contract out so it can be secret-ish.
- solidasparagus 7y agoThat all sounds nice in theory but in practice you cannot get access to info about top-secret infrastructure. If you don't believe me, just try it.
- Ericson2314 7y agoHow do you know it wasn't all contracted? The best example I can think of is Ghidra from the NSA, which was formally classified. See https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra/blob/master/NOTICE https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra/blob/master..., parts of it are not the work of the government and not public domain.
- solidasparagus 7y agoI think what you're referring to is the copyright status of government work. Just because it is not copyrightable does not mean it is publicly available.