3 ms·
I’m not asserting anything other than that this argument is not based on data. The data aren’t there, you aren’t an expert, and this argument doesn’t help anyo
by wbronitsky 7y ago
I’m not asserting anything other than that this argument is not based on data.
The data aren’t there, you aren’t an expert, and this argument doesn’t help anyone. That’s the most positive read I can give what I consider to be a reckless take, and this take will be EVERYWHERE in the next few weeks. We need to guard ourselves because this take is deceptive; it lets us feel superior to everyone who is freaking out, which will help individuals calm down at the expense of public health.
- Mikeb85 7y agoIf you want to be a doomer and ignore actual stats in favour of alarmism go ahead. It's your life. If you want to ever take your head out of the sand, here's some resources: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/ https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-... https://covid19.who.int/ https://covid19.who.int/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/13/opinion/coronavirus-immunity.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/13/opinion/coronavirus-immun... Here's the only stat I actually, truly give a shit about: my province has 4 million people in it and 50 deaths.
- Lewton 7y ago> Here's the only stat I actually, truly give a shit about: my province has 4 million people in it and 50 deaths. What would you expect this to look like without a lockdown
- Mikeb85 7y agoProbably something more like Sweden but then again, our demographics are pretty good. Either way, I'd expect all the potential deaths in a shorter timeframe. What I really would have preferred is a response more akin to Taiwan's. A lockdown was required because of how lax we were in allowing travellers to return from China and Europe with virtually no screening. Had we simply taken it seriously in January (our government was shockingly nonchalant back then) we could have avoided a lot.