3 ms·
This looks rather interesting. Could someone working in this field comment on this theory?
by java-man 6y ago
This looks rather interesting. Could someone working in this field comment on this theory?
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoArticle was published in 2013. I haven't heard much about this since, so I'm going to guess that it didn't turn out to be the answer. (Or at least, it has not yet shown itself to be superior to mainstream theories.)
- kingkongjaffa 6y agoJoseph Conlon of the University of Oxford stated that some of these particles, if they existed, would already have been detected in existing accelerators such as the Large Hadron Collider.[12] > sounds like a hack to me. Few physicists attended and no preprint, paper, or equations were published.[13] Weinstein's ideas were not widely debated. The few that did engage expressed skepticism.[12][14] They were unable to debate more intensely due to the fact that there was no published paper.[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Weinstein https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Weinstein
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoI don't know where you got "sounds like a hack to me", but you're not quoting my parent comment.
- loceng 6y agoEric Weinstein on April 2nd posted the lecture to his YouTube channel + at the end of video he goes over to clarify some details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7rd04KzLcg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7rd04KzLcg