3 ms·
I've never really heard this from anyone that is actually technical. I think people with actual technical skills and joy would be quite impressed by mainframe
by kev009 7y ago
I've never really heard this from anyone that is actually technical. I think people with actual technical skills and joy would be quite impressed by mainframe systems.
The issue for management is you can't copy someone else's strategy like hiring random fungible devs so easily, you need to invest in some training and retaining. So if you're a stuffed shirt the easiest thing to do to explain your lack of leadership and foresight is to point to the mysterious system and point to other companies doing (x, y or z) and say you need to be more like them in a copycat way with little consideration for the difficulty or success of the existing business and systems. The evergreening that goes on in tech is extremely low dividend activity for any business but the new employees and new vendors make a lot of money until they too are out fashioned.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- rhizome 7y agoMy impression is that the nature of mainframe systems and the applications that run on them is that they're essentially fully custom operations that could serve as full-stack object lessons in Conway's Law.
- strbean 7y agoReally? My impression is that you have to scour the earth for people who know anything about those systems, and then pay them 5x what you would pay someone working on a modern system.
- kev009 7y agoDid you like.. actually read my comment? Poorly run companies want the equivalent of a Scala dev with 30 years of Scala experience. It doesn't work like that. Computer systems and PLs aren't that hard to pick up.