2 ms·
Interesting. To what extent do you think these programs filter a population with an innate distribution to find a subset versus train people to develop these c
by LeifCarrotson 7y ago
Interesting. To what extent do you think these programs filter a population with an innate distribution to find a subset versus train people to develop these characteristics?
A friend of mine is a nuclear engineer, she's not been deployed yet, but has gone through the same filter process. A similar though less extreme filtering happened in my engineering college, there were 250 people in my EGR 101 class, by second semester EGR 110 had 140 people, and I graduated with a class of 61.
I found this article from earlier this year about the "Fremen Mirage" or hard times/strong men/good times/weak men/hard times trope and thought it interesting. Seems topical.
https://acoup.blog/2020/01/17/collections-the-fremen-mirage-part-i-war-at-the-dawn-of-civilization/ https://acoup.blog/2020/01/17/collections-the-fremen-mirage-...
- brandmeyer 7y ago> To what extent do you think these programs filter a population with an innate distribution to find a subset versus train people to develop these characteristics? I think the bias is very strongly towards training. The recruiting pipeline sucks up everyone with enough intelligence to pass some standardized tests. However, everyone who enlists knows that they are going to be facing a hard life. The fact of the matter is that if you are smart enough to become a nuke, you're probably also smart enough to work as an engineer. The vast majority of enlisted nukes got there in order to get a second chance at life. Most of my shipmates either flunked out of college or couldn't get into college due to shenanigans in high school. I was in the latter category.