4 ms·
At the turbo clock the i9-10900F is 5GHz vs. 4.3Ghz for Ryzen 9 4900HS. At the base clock the i9-10900F is 2.8GHz vs. 3GHz for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. Basically im
by zrm 7y ago
At the turbo clock the i9-10900F is 5GHz vs. 4.3Ghz for Ryzen 9 4900HS. At the base clock the i9-10900F is 2.8GHz vs. 3GHz for the Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Basically implies that Ryzen has better performance per watt, which doesn't affect absolute performance until you exhaust the power budget and have to lower the clock speed, i.e. use all the cores instead of just one.
edit: 4900HS, not 4900H
- kllrnohj 7y agoSmall nit but the comparison here is against the 4900HS 4900H: 4.4ghz boost, 3.3ghz base 4900HS: 4.3ghz boost, 3.0ghz base With the non-S variant being the more power hungry one with an up to 54W TDP vs. the S's 35W TDP.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- zrm 7y agoInterestingly even the faster 4900H has a lower TDP than the 65W i9-10900F.