3 ms·
The epidemiologists are the ones projecting IFR at ~0.35. It's not responsible to use a crudely calculated CFR when you have ample evidence that the case rate
by rootusrootus 7y ago
The epidemiologists are the ones projecting IFR at ~0.35. It's not responsible to use a crudely calculated CFR when you have ample evidence that the case rate is vastly underestimating the infection rate. It's also terrible to try and use 'recovered' numbers when a lot of localities do not track and report recovered cases.