> It's still open if you can get it produced for your own needs No, it's not. That's just not what the term means. > The restrictions only apply on reselling

> It's still open if you can get it produced for your own needs No, it's not. That's just not what the term means. > The restrictions only apply on reselling it for profit, which is an acceptable condition. I doubt it. That would be enough to disqualify a software licence as Open Source [0], and I imagine it disqualifies a hardware project from being Open Source Hardware too [1] [2]. [0] https://stackoverflow.com/a/8212363/ https://stackoverflow.com/a/8212363/ [1] https://www.oshwa.org/faq/ https://www.oshwa.org/faq/ [2] https://opensource.com/law/15/2/intro-open-hardware-licensing https://opensource.com/law/15/2/intro-open-hardware-licensin...